Publikationen
WGG-Publikationen 2024
Jany Kl.-D. (2024): Anwendungen neuer genomischer Techniken bei Nutzpflanzen und die vorgesehene
gesetzliche Regulierung in der Europäischen Union
Jany, K.-D. (2024): Wie geht es weiter mit CRISPR-Cas in der EU?
Gentechnik und neue genomische Techniken in der Pflanzenzüchtung. Biologie in Unserer Zeit, 54(S), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.11576/biuz-7569
In: Bd. 54 (2024): Biologie in unserer Zeit – Sonderheft CRISPR-Cas … mehr als nur Verteidigung
https://www.biuz.de/index.php/biuz/issue/view/486
Jany Kl.-D. (2024): Mit neuen genomischen Techniken in der Pflanzenzüchtung zu neuen und nachhaltigen
Lebensmitteln VFED aktuell Plus 202, 57-62
pdf-file: https://www.wggev.de/wp-content/uploads/NGT-04-VFED-2024.pdf
Jany Kl.-D. und Widhalm K. (2024): Gentechnik und Nahrungsmittel
Anwendungen der Gentechnik werden in der Landwirtschaft und beim Umweltschutz seit mehr als 30 Jahren kontrovers diskutiert. Verfahren für genetische Veränderungen von Organismen wurden in diesem Zeitraum immer präziser.
ÖSTERREICHISCHE ÄRZTEZEITUNG 12, 40-42
https://aerztezeitung.at/2024/oaz-artikel/medizin/originalarbeit-gentechnik-und-nahrungsmittel/
Jany Kl.-D. (2024): Gentechnik und neue genomische Verfahren in der Pflanzenzüchtung – Ouo vadis?
Rundschau für Fleischhygiene und Lebensmittelüberwachung 6/l2024, 186 – 192
https://www.wggev.de/wp-content/uploads/RFL-06_76_Jany01.pdf
Jany Kl.-D. (2024): Gentechnik und neue genomische Verfahren
journal culinaire in „Kulturpflanzenentwicklung“ 38 2024, 62-77
Vom WGG empfohlene Publikationen
Für Dezember empfohlene Veröffentlichungen
Wesseler J., Cingiz K., Jin Y., Kardung M., Simonett M. (2024): Report on the repercussions associated with traceability, labeling, and coexistence requirements for plants obtained by New Genomic Techniques
De Schrijver N., Wijns J., Patrick Rüdelsheim P. (2024): Interpretation of the GMO definition in EU Member States
Exploration of how some elements of the GMO definition are interpreted across European Member States
https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/15f63566-b13f-4b11-a4cf-570e7d9ed83b/file
Für November 01 empfohlene Veröffentlichungen
Ricroch A., Desachy L.-D., Penfornis M., Akin M., Kondic -Spika A, Kuntz M. and Miladinovic´ D. (2024): Worldwide study on field trials of biotechnological crops: new promises but old policy hurdles. Front. Plant Sci. 15: 1452767 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1452767
Field trials (FTs) are a necessary step towards future commercialization of biotech crops and products thereof, whether for research and development or cultivation approval. A total of 187 FTs in 30 countries have been compiled for 2022 and 2023 using a survey and intergovernmental databases. FTs have been classified according to methods, crops and traits. Compiled FTs are mostly conducted by the public sector on eight plant species with improved stress resistance, industrial application, yield, and quality. Regarding genome editing (GenEd), 23 FTs (12% of total) are carried out in 6 countries, on 10 crops. Regulations were examined in 141 countries to discuss why in some countries FTs are not performed, although basic biotech research is carried out. The EU particularly is compared to the rest of the world. Regarding the new proposal in the EU for GenEd product classification, it was found that all recent FTs of such products fall in the category that the EU would consider as ‘equivalent to conventional plants’ (NGT-1). We also studied current cultivation approvals to highlight differences with crops tested in the field and those may be approved in the future.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1452767/full
Für Oktober 01 empfohlene Veröffentlichungen
Noack F., Engist D., Gantois J., Gaur V., Hyjazie B.F., Larsen A., M’Gonigle L.K., Missirian A., Qaim M., […] , and Kremen C. +2 authors (2024): Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops, Science 385, Issue 6712 | DOI: 10.1126/science.ado9340
Genetically modified (GM) crops have been adopted by some of the world’s leading agricultural nations, but the full extent of their environmental impact remains largely unknown. Although concerns regarding the direct environmental effects of GM crops have declined, GM crops have led to indirect changes in agricultural practices, including pesticide use, agricultural expansion, and cropping patterns, with profound environmental implications. Recent studies paint a nuanced picture of these environmental impacts, with mixed effects of GM crop adoption on biodiversity, deforestation, and human health that vary with the GM trait and geographic scale. New GM or gene-edited crops with different traits would likely have different environmental and human health impacts.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado9340 ► hier die pdf-Datei
Wray-Cahen D., Hallerman E., Tizard M. (2024): Global regulatory policies for animal biotechnology: overview, opportunities and challenges. Front. Genome Ed. 6:1467080. | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1467080
Genome editing (GnEd) has the potential to provide many benefits to animal agriculture, offering a means for achieving rapid growth, disease resistance, and novel phenotypes. The technology has the potential to be useful for rapidly incorporating traits into existing selectively bred animals without the need for crossbreeding and backcrossing. Yet only four products from animals created via biotechnology, all growth-enhanced fishes, have reached commercialization and only on a limited scale. The past failure of genetically engineered (or GM) products to reach conventional producers can largely be attributed to the high cost of meeting GMO regulatory requirements. We review the history of GMO regulations internationally, noting the influence of Codex Alimentarius on the development of many existing regulatory frameworks. We highlight new regulatory approaches for GnEd organisms, first developed by Argentina, and the adoption of similar approaches by other countries. Such new regulatory approaches allow GnEd organisms that could have been developed by conventional means to be regulated under the same rules as conventional organisms and in the future is likely to enhance the opportunity for biotech animals to enter production. Treating certain GnEd products as conventional has had a large impact on the variety of biotechnological innovations successfully navigating regulatory processes. We suggest that for the full potential of GnEd technologies to be realized, enabling public policies are needed to facilitate use of GnEd as a breeding tool to incorporate new traits within existing animal breeding programs, rather than only a tool to create distinct new products.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genome-editing/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1467080/full
Für September 01 empfohlene Veröffentlichungen
Noack F., Engist D., Gantois J., Gaur V., Hyjazie B.F., Larsen A. et al. (2024): Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops. Science 385, Issue 6712 | DOI: 10.1126/science.ado9340
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado9340
Manzoor S.,Nabi S.U., Rather T.R., Gani G. et al.(2024): Advancing crop disease resistance through genome editing: a promising approach for enhancing agricultural production. Front. Genome Ed., Sec. Genome Editing in Plants Volume 6 – 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1399051
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genome-editing/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1399051/full
Nianiou-Obeidat I.; Tsakirpaloglou N.; Petrou,N.; Deligiannidou E.; Makri N.-M. (2024): Genome-Editing Products Line up for the Market: Will Europe Harvest the Benefits from Science and Innovation? Genes 15, 1014. | https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15081014
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/15/8/1014